Lommel United 0-1 Club Brugge KV: result and stats, Jupiler Pro League
- T. Eyoma45' (og)
Lommel United4-1-4-1
Substitutions
- 64'S. Adewoye
46.3S. De Grand
796.9 - 81'S. Appuah
116.5N. Corthouts
466.9 - 90'D. Konadu
97.2
Unused
Substitutions
- 60'M. Diakhon
676.6J. Virgili
116.9 - 81'H. Vetlesen
107.2C. Tsawa
166.7 - 81'R. Vermant
176.7A. Vasovic
776.5 - 88'
- 88'N. Tresoldi
76.3
Unused
| Player | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Yann SommerG | 2 | 0 | 0,35 | +0,35 | 27/33 | 2/8 |
 Matthias PieklakG | 2 | 1 | 0,34 | +0,34 | 30/42 | 4/16 |
Live statsPossession & Passing
Attack
Box & Quality
Defense & Discipline
Half by half
The same match, split at the break. Which half did each side actually win?
First half
Second half
xG analytics
Lommel UnitedClub Brugge KVExpected goals weighs every shot by the historic conversion rate of similar chances. Higher xG means better scoring opportunities, regardless of whether they went in.
xG race
21 shotsChance quality as it built up. A steep step is a big chance.
Lommel United0,65 xG · 0 scoredClub Brugge KV0,80 xG · 1 scoredHow those chances were made
Momentum
26 swingsWhich side was on top, minute by minute. A taller bar is heavier pressure.
Lommel United33% pressureClub Brugge KV67% pressureMatch replay
91'0-183' Off target Don-Angelo Konadu 0.18 xG · Regular play · HeaderShot map
7 v 13Lommel United shoot right, Club Brugge KV left. Bigger dot = better chance.
Goal mouth
9 on target · 0 scoredWhere each shot on target crossed the line. Placement beats power.
Average positions
Each starter's average position on the ball, with the number of those actions inside the chip. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to see where they actually were.
Lommel UnitedDefensive line 28%Club Brugge KVDefensive line 38%An average, not a movement map: it says where a player's actions balanced out, not where they ran.
Passing network
Each player at his average position, sized by passes made. Lines join team-mates with 5 or more passes between them (fewer when a side made its first change early), thicker for more. Counted until each side's first substitution. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to isolate his links.
Lommel UnitedUntil 64'Most-connected pair: Adewoye and Wouters, 17 passes between them.
Club Brugge KVUntil 60'Most-connected pair: Mechele and Lee, 37 passes between them.
Tactical battle
39control61In possession
Field tilt is each side's share of play in the final third.
Out of possession
↓ Lower is better, so the longer bar always wins. PPDA is opponent passes allowed per defensive action.
Carrying
Distances are how far the ball was moved forward, not how far anybody ran.
Beating the press
A take-on is a player going past an opponent with the ball at his feet.
Threat created
xT values where a possession reached; VAEP values every action by how much it shifted the chance of a goal.
Tempo
An attack is direct when it moves upfield quickly rather than through many passes.
More match stats
Attack
Passing
Duels
Defending
Goal profile
This seasonHow often each side reaches a scoreline, across 8 matches each.
Share of their matchesThey score
They concede
Heaviest results
best 4-0 (H)·worst 0-5 (A)
best 3-0 (H)·worst 1-2 (A)
Match summary
Club Brugge KV beat Lommel United 1-0 at Soevereinstadion in the Jupiler Pro League. Club Brugge KV led 1-0 at half-time. The only goal was an own goal by T. Eyoma in the 45th minute. In their last 1 meeting, Lommel United have won 0, Club Brugge KV 1, with 0 drawn. Full match stats, lineups and player ratings are all on this page.
→ Winner: Club Brugge KV
Why this prediction
The factors the model weighed, each split between the two sides.
Share per factor
Who will win?
Cast your vote!
Head-to-headLast 1 meetings
0Lommel United
