
FC Cincinnati 1-1 Seattle Sounders: result and stats, Major League Soccer
- Evander24'
- 83'K. Kossa-Rienzi
FC Cincinnati

Substitutions
- 59'
- 73'B. J. Ramirez Leon
296.0P. Bucha
206.0 - 73'T. Barlow
166.2A. Jabbari
996.2 - 89'E. Echenique
667.1 - 89'T. Anunga
277.1
Unused
- E. LouroG
13 - N. HagglundD
4 - T. HadebeD
15 - K. SmithD
24
Frederico JuarezSubstitutions
- 61'
- 61'S. Brunell
376.3D. Musovski
196.5 - 77'O. De Rosario
956.2A. Roldan
166.6 - 77'
- 90'S. Gomez
906.8
Unused
- S. FreiG
24 - X. GnaulatiM
32 - R. JaureguiM
42 - M. Bronnik
81
Home
No reported injuries.
Away

OutP. ArriolaCalf Injury
OutH. DotsonMuscle Injury
OutJ. FerreiraInjury
OutY. Gomez AndradeMuscle Injury
OutJ. MorrisMuscle Injury
OutN. PetkovicKnee Injury
OutJ. RagenKnee Injury
OutC. RoldanCalf Injury
OutP. de La VegaCalf Injury

Player of the match
Highest-rated players




xG race
27 shotsChance quality as it built up. A steep step is a big chance.
How those chances were made
Shot map
17 v 10FC Cincinnati shoot right, Seattle Sounders left. Bigger dot = better chance.
Goal mouth
18 on target · 2 scoredWhere each shot on target crossed the line. Placement beats power.
Shot duel
Rothrock's 44' chance was the biggest of the match: 0,49 xG, missed.
Every shot on its minute, FC Cincinnati above and Seattle Sounders below. The longer the bar, the bigger the chance. Faces on goals and on chances of 0,3 xG or more.
xG analytics
FC Cincinnati
Seattle SoundersExpected goals weighs every shot by the historic conversion rate of similar chances. Higher xG means better scoring opportunities, regardless of whether they went in.
Momentum
19 swingsWhich side was on top, minute by minute. A taller bar is heavier pressure.
Match replay
91'
1-1
90' Saved Kévin Denkey 0.05 xG · Regular play · Right footAverage positions
Each starter's average position on the ball, with the number of those actions inside the chip. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to see where they actually were.
An average, not a movement map: it says where a player's actions balanced out, not where they ran.
Passing network
Each player at his average position, sized by passes made. Lines join team-mates with 5 or more passes between them (fewer when a side made its first change early), thicker for more. Counted until each side's first substitution. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to isolate his links.
Most-connected pair: Chirilă and Robinson, 39 passes between them.
Most-connected pair: Sailor and Thomas, 12 passes between them.
Tactical battle
66control34

In possession
Field tilt is each side's share of play in the final third.
Out of possession
↓ Lower is better, so the longer bar always wins. PPDA is opponent passes allowed per defensive action.
Carrying
Distances are how far the ball was moved forward, not how far anybody ran.
Beating the press
A take-on is a player going past an opponent with the ball at his feet.
Threat created
xT values where a possession reached; VAEP values every action by how much it shifted the chance of a goal.
Tempo
An attack is direct when it moves upfield quickly rather than through many passes.
The moment that decided it
The goal that swung the win probability the most.
- Score
- 0–0→1–0
- FC Cincinnati win chance
- 36%→80%
Possession & Passing
Attack
Box & Quality
Defense & Discipline
Half by half
The same match, split at the break. Which half did each side actually win?
First half
Second half
More match stats
Attack
Passing
Duels
Defending
Match summary
FC Cincinnati and Seattle Sounders drew 1-1 at TQL Stadium in the Major League Soccer. FC Cincinnati led 1-0 at half-time. Scorers: Evander (24') for FC Cincinnati; K. Kossa-Rienzi (83') for Seattle Sounders. In their last 4 meetings, FC Cincinnati have won 1, Seattle Sounders 1, with 2 drawn. Full match stats, lineups and player ratings are all on this page.
→ Winner: FC Cincinnati
Why this prediction
The factors the model weighed, each split between the two sides.
Who will win?
Cast your vote!
Goal profile
This seasonHow often each side reaches a scoreline, across 34 matches each.
They score
They concede
Heaviest results
best 6-2 (H)·worst 1-6 (A)
best 4-1 (H)·worst 1-5 (H)




























