Chicago Fire 1-1 Inter Miami: Result, Lineups & Stats

Player
Chris BradyG	6	1	1,60	+0,60	25/32	7/14
Dayne St. ClairG	2	1	1,02	+0,02	17/22	0/5

xG race

30 shots

Chance quality as it built up. A steep step is a big chance.

Chicago Fire0,83 xG · 1 scored

Inter Miami1,41 xG · 1 scored

How those chances were made

Chicago Fire20

Open play 12Set piece 3Dribble 1Foul won 3Rebound 1

Inter Miami40

Open play 25Set piece 3Dribble 3Foul won 3Rebound 5Defensive 1

Shot map

10 v 20

Chicago Fire shoot right, Inter Miami left. Bigger dot = better chance.

CFChicago FireIMInter Miamigoalsavedoff target

Goal mouth

23 on target · 2 scored

Where each shot on target crossed the line. Placement beats power.

Chicago FireInter Miamigoalsavedoff target

Shot duel

Berterame's 47' chance was the biggest of the match: 0,34 xG, saved.

Every shot on its minute, Chicago Fire above and Inter Miami below. The longer the bar, the bigger the chance. Faces on goals and on chances of 0,3 xG or more.

Chicago Fire10 shots · 0,83 xG

Inter Miami20 shots · 1,41 xG

Germán Berterame

Inter Miami

47'0,34 xGSaved

Momentum

15 swings

Which side was on top, minute by minute. A taller bar is heavier pressure.

Chicago Fire42% pressure

Inter Miami58% pressure

Match replay

91'

1-1

0%Draw 100%0%

0.83xG1.41

10Shots20

7On target16

Momentum

90' Off target Ian Fray 0.09 xG · Regular play · Right foot

Average positions

Each starter's average position on the ball, with the number of those actions inside the chip. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to see where they actually were.

Chicago FireDefensive line 39%

Inter MiamiDefensive line 39%

An average, not a movement map: it says where a player's actions balanced out, not where they ran.

Passing network

Each player at his average position, sized by passes made. Lines join team-mates with 5 or more passes between them (fewer when a side made its first change early), thicker for more. Counted until each side's first substitution. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to isolate his links.

Chicago FireUntil 56'

Most-connected pairs: Elliott and Dean; Salétros and Dean. 13 passes each.

Inter MiamiUntil 78'

Most-connected pair: Falcón and Casemiro, 37 passes between them.

Tactical battle

45control55

Lionel Messi

6 touches in box

In possession

47,4%Field tilt52,6%

10Passes into box14

27Progressive passes45

10Carries into final third8

6Chances created10

Field tilt is each side's share of play in the final third.

Out of possession

13,30Press intensity (PPDA)8,94

10High turnovers11

13Regains within 5s5

30,2sBall recovery time31,4s

17Interceptions29

↓ Lower is better, so the longer bar always wins. PPDA is opponent passes allowed per defensive action.

Carrying

102Carries143

1248mCarry distance1571m

8Progressive carries16

558mProgressive carry distance910m

2Carries into the box1

Distances are how far the ball was moved forward, not how far anybody ran.

Beating the press

7Take-ons won6

17Take-ons attempted15

444mProgressive pass distance808m

1Through balls1

3Switches of play9

A take-on is a player going past an opponent with the ball at his feet.

Threat created

0,80Expected threat (xT)1,04

1,33Action value (VAEP)1,10

20Shot-creating actions40

2Goal-creating actions2

0,64Expected assisted goals0,52

xT values where a possession reached; VAEP values every action by how much it shifted the chance of a goal.

Tempo

3,7Passes per attack3,8

12,8sAttack duration12,6s

2,08 m/sAttack directness1,99 m/s

5Build-up attacks5

7Direct attacks5

An attack is direct when it moves upfield quickly rather than through many passes.

The moment that decided it

The goal that swung the win probability the most. Press play to replay the move, touch by touch.

R. LewandowskiRight foot · assist A. Gutman10'

Score: 0–0→1–0
Chicago Fire win chance: 40%→71%
xG of the shot: 0.19
Touches in the move: 6

1A. Salétros›
2D. T. D'Avilla›
3M. Haile-Selassie›
4R. Lod›
5A. Gutmanassist›
6R. LewandowskiRight foot

Half by half

The same match, split at the break. Which half did each side actually win?

First half

0,38xG0,46

3Shots9

1On target3

2Big chances0

3Touches in box10

38%Possession62%

0Corners3

Second half

0,45xG0,91

7Shots11

2On target4

2Big chances0

12Touches in box18

52%Possession48%

2Corners2

More match stats

Attack

15Touches in box27

38Final third entries61

4Big chances0

1,02xG on target1,60

3Big chances missed0

Passing

5/12 (42%)Crosses2/14 (14%)

15/29 (52%)Long balls19/38 (50%)

19Throw-ins12

14Free kicks16

10Goal kicks4

Duels

48Total52

32/69 (46%)Ground37/69 (54%)

6/10 (60%)Aerial4/10 (40%)

9/19 (47%)Dribbles6/13 (46%)

7Dispossessed3

Defending

40Recoveries41

12Interceptions17

10Tackles17

40%Tackles won47%

31Clearances13

1Big chances scored0

2Big saves1

2Errors led to shot1

4Fouled in final third3

95.6 kmDistance covered90.4 km

76Sprints77

6,96Average rating6,73

Player duel

Match summary

Chicago Fire and Inter Miami drew 1-1 at Soldier Field in the Major League Soccer. Chicago Fire led 1-0 at half-time. Scorers: R. Lewandowski (10') for Chicago Fire; Casemiro (48') for Inter Miami. In their last 12 meetings, Chicago Fire have won 5, Inter Miami 4, with 3 drawn. Full match stats, lineups and player ratings are all on this page.