VfL Osnabrück 0-3 1. FC Magdeburg: result and stats, 2. Bundesliga
- 24', 35'A. Nollenberger
- 69'E. Iyoha
VfL Osnabrück3-4-3
Substitutions
- 46'T. Lesueur
235.8K. Faber
285.5 - 46'
- 46'I. Badjie
106.1B. Riesselmann
226.6 - 78'B. Jacobsen
156.5B. Henning
65.7 - 88'P. Kammerbauer
317.0L. Opitz
195.8
Unused
- N. SauterG
1 - T. JanottaD
20 - L. BornscheinD
18 - L. RaimundF
17
Substitutions
- 71'P. Nadjombe
287.1R. Tachie
296.4 - 83'A. Nollenberger
179.52E. Dzogovic
47.0 - 83'L. Mergner
336.3T. Reitz
146.9 - 89'L. Hyrylainen
387.7AP. Jaeckel
67.0 - 89'
Unused
- N. KruthG
30 - T. ChahedD
24 - K. MantheyF
20
Highest-rated players
| Player | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 D. ReimannG | 4 | 0,56 | +0,56 | 51/65 | 16/29 |
 J. KrumreyG | 3 | 2,50 | -0,50 | 13/24 | 2/13 |
Live statsPossession & Passing
Attack
Box & Quality
Defense & Discipline
Half by half
The same match, split at the break. Which half did each side actually win?
First half
Second half
xG analytics
VfL Osnabrück1. FC MagdeburgExpected goals weighs every shot by the historic conversion rate of similar chances. Higher xG means better scoring opportunities, regardless of whether they went in.
xG race
30 shotsChance quality as it built up. A steep step is a big chance.
VfL Osnabrück0,97 xG · 0 scored1. FC Magdeburg1,77 xG · 3 scoredHow those chances were made
Momentum
13 swingsWhich side was on top, minute by minute. A taller bar is heavier pressure.
VfL Osnabrück29% pressure1. FC Magdeburg71% pressureMatch replay
91'0-3Shot map
11 v 19VfL Osnabrück shoot right, 1. FC Magdeburg left. Bigger dot = better chance.
Goal mouth
14 on target · 3 scoredWhere each shot on target crossed the line. Placement beats power.
Average positions
Each starter's average position on the ball, with the number of those actions inside the chip. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to see where they actually were.
VfL OsnabrückDefensive line 37%1. FC MagdeburgDefensive line 34%An average, not a movement map: it says where a player's actions balanced out, not where they ran.
Passing network
Each player at his average position, sized by passes made. Lines join team-mates with 5 or more passes between them (fewer when a side made its first change early), thicker for more. Counted until each side's first substitution. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to isolate his links.
VfL OsnabrückUntil 45'Most-connected pair: Jacobsen and Wiemann, 6 passes between them.
1. FC MagdeburgUntil 71'Most-connected pair: Müller and Nadjombe, 29 passes between them.
Tactical battle
45control55
In possession
Field tilt is each side's share of play in the final third.
Out of possession
↓ Lower is better, so the longer bar always wins. PPDA is opponent passes allowed per defensive action.
Carrying
Distances are how far the ball was moved forward, not how far anybody ran.
Beating the press
A take-on is a player going past an opponent with the ball at his feet.
Threat created
xT values where a possession reached; VAEP values every action by how much it shifted the chance of a goal.
Tempo
An attack is direct when it moves upfield quickly rather than through many passes.
More match stats
Attack
Passing
Duels
Defending
Goal profile
This seasonHow often each side reaches a scoreline, across 7 matches each.
Share of their matchesThey score
They concede
Heaviest results
best 3-1 (H)·worst 0-3 (H)
best 3-0 (H)·worst 1-6 (H)
Match summary
1. FC Magdeburg beat VfL Osnabrück 3-0 at Bremer Brücke in the 2. Bundesliga. 1. FC Magdeburg led 2-0 at half-time. Scorers: A. Nollenberger (24', 35'), E. Iyoha (69') for 1. FC Magdeburg. Full match stats, lineups and player ratings are all on this page.
→ Winner: VfL Osnabrück & over 3.5 goals
Why this prediction
The factors the model weighed, each split between the two sides.
Share per factor
Who will win?
Cast your vote!
