Tigre 2-1 Central Cordoba de Santiago: result and stats, Liga Profesional Argentina
- M. Mendez6'
- S. Lopez26'
- 58' (pen)M. Santos
Tigre











6.6
6.8
7.2
6.4
7.1
6.3
7.0
6.3
6.8
5.9
6.3- FÁ24Federico Álvarez
- IS25Ian Subiabre
- TS11Tiago Serrago
- IP50Ignacio Peluffo
- BL5Bruno Leyes
- LM26Lautaro Morales
- LM40Luciano Minniti
- JE30Jalil Elías
- SL47Sebastian Lezcano
- SM21Sebastián Medina
- AO19Alfio Oviedo
- MR77Marco Rivas
Substitutions
- 46'Tiago Cravero
56.3Marco Iacobellis
106.6 - 67'Leonardo Sequeira
286.3Lucas González
187.0 - 67'Horacio Tijanovich
117.1Ezequiel Naya
196.4 - 83'Diego Barrera
75.9Alan Daian Laprida
376.5
Unused

Player of the match
Highest-rated players




xG race
27 shotsChance quality as it built up. A steep step is a big chance.
How those chances were made
Shot map
15 v 12Tigre shoot right, Central Cordoba de Santiago left. Bigger dot = better chance.
Goal mouth
12 on target · 3 scoredWhere each shot on target crossed the line. Placement beats power.
Shot duel
Méndez's 5' chance was the biggest of the match: 0,80 xG, scored.
Every shot on its minute, Tigre above and Central Cordoba de Santiago below. The longer the bar, the bigger the chance. Faces on goals and on chances of 0,3 xG or more.
xG analytics
Tigre
Central Cordoba de SantiagoExpected goals weighs every shot by the historic conversion rate of similar chances. Higher xG means better scoring opportunities, regardless of whether they went in.
Momentum
19 swingsWhich side was on top, minute by minute. A taller bar is heavier pressure.
Match replay
91'
2-1
87' Off target Ezequiel Naya 0.26 xG · Regular play · Left footAverage positions
Each starter's average position on the ball, with the number of those actions inside the chip. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to see where they actually were.
An average, not a movement map: it says where a player's actions balanced out, not where they ran.
Passing network
Each player at his average position, sized by passes made. Lines join team-mates with 5 or more passes between them (fewer when a side made its first change early), thicker for more. Counted until each side's first substitution. Both sides attack left to right. Tap a player to isolate his links.
Most-connected pairs: Villalba and Zenobio; Moreno and Saralegui. 8 passes each.
Most-connected pair: Cáceres and Maciel, 16 passes between them.
Tactical battle
50control50

In possession
Field tilt is each side's share of play in the final third.
Out of possession
↓ Lower is better, so the longer bar always wins. PPDA is opponent passes allowed per defensive action.
Carrying
Distances are how far the ball was moved forward, not how far anybody ran.
Beating the press
A take-on is a player going past an opponent with the ball at his feet.
Threat created
xT values where a possession reached; VAEP values every action by how much it shifted the chance of a goal.
Tempo
An attack is direct when it moves upfield quickly rather than through many passes.
The moment that decided it
The goal that swung the win probability the most. Press play to replay the move, touch by touch.
- Score
- 0–0→1–0
- Tigre win chance
- 56%→77%
- xG of the shot
- 0.80
- Touches in the move
- 3
- 1J. Saralegui›
- 2J. Villalbaassist›
- 3M. MéndezRight foot
Possession & Passing
Attack
Box & Quality
Defense & Discipline
Half by half
The same match, split at the break. Which half did each side actually win?
First half
Second half
More match stats
Attack
Passing
Duels
Defending
Match summary
Tigre beat Central Cordoba de Santiago 2-1 at Estadio Jose Dellagiovanna in Liga Profesional Argentina. Tigre led 2-0 at half-time. Scorers: M. Mendez (6'), S. Lopez (26') for Tigre; M. Santos (58' pen) for Central Cordoba de Santiago. Full match stats, lineups and player ratings are all on this page.
→ Double chance: Tigre or draw & under 3.5 goals
Why this prediction
The factors the model weighed, each split between the two sides.
Who will win?
Cast your vote!
Goal profile
This seasonHow often each side reaches a scoreline, across 32 matches each.
They score
They concede
Heaviest results
best 4-1 (A)·worst 0-2 (H)
best 2-0 (H)·worst 0-5 (H)



























